Having Internet is kind of a fundamental right in today’s world. Because the Internet is so important to us and at the same time still a relatively new and fast changing medium, it is widely discussed how to handle it. Net activists, companies and politicians try to strengthen their lobbies. As a company offering advanced network technology we are in the middle of this discussion. At least there is one thing of value that we can contribute: our technical view on things.
So, this is it? When I saw the news after the net neutrality discussion in Brussels the week before last, I was immensely relieved. Compared with the US – they are still in the middle of the net neutrality debate – Europe managed to find an acceptable compromise within a few months.
Following up on the net neutrality workshop organized by VATMearlier this year, in a second meeting last week there seemed to be some consensus among German operators that charging content providers for downstream traffic sent mostly from the United States through their networks to German subscribers, though an intriguing idea, will not work. And these subscribers will remain their main revenue source also in the near future. So what can ISPs do to counter the downward spiral of ever faster and cheaper flat rate plans?
Last week I participated in a meeting of the German Association of Telecommunications and Value-Added Service Providers (VATM), which got together to establish a net neutrality working group. The discussion pretty much reiterated the arguments that have been exchanged in the United States for quite some time now. So far this has not been a big topic in Germany or Europe outside of some expert and activist circles. To my knowledge, operators have pretty much ignored the net neutrality debate so far. And I am not entirely sure why that is — maybe because we are just lagging behind the US as in so many other cases, or because of a different attitude toward civil liberties. Either way, I certainly welcome a debate provided it involves all stakeholders: legislators, operators, civil rights activists and technology experts.
Last week, I participated in a workshop session called “Deep Packet Inspection: Technology, Promise & Controversy. What You Need to Know.” at the Broadband World Forum Europe 2009 in Paris. The panel discussion with participants from DPI vendors, Internet service providers and net neutrality activists was meant to “foster an open, balanced and rigorous discussion of DPI’s capabilities, benefits, limits and concerns”.
Many Internet users worry about net neutrality and online privacy these days. And they see deep packet inspection (DPI) as their arch enemy. Common claims are that DPI reads the content of all packets and then decides based on the nature of the content whether to forward, slow down or drop that packet. This is a misconception based on poor understanding how today’s DPI for Internet traffic management works.
DPI is only the core technology of traffic management systems that is used for application classification. This is done by scanning the first few packets — including their payload — of each network flow for certain patterns out of a predefined list. DPI does not ‘read’ or even ‘understand’ any communication content. As soon as the communicating application of a network flow is identified, DPI stops for that flow. Then, bandwidth management rules determine how this flow is treated. Possible rules are:
A few weeks ago, American cable operator Comcast was questioned by regulator FCC about the management of its digital voice service and how it may put competing voice services running over Comcast’s network at a disadvantage. This has again sparked the net neutrality debate. We as a company offering traffic management gear are naturally interested in this matter. So should ISPs be allowed to offer a QoS-enhanced IP voice service?
Welcome to the ipoque Corporate Blog. In this space ipoque bloggers and guests are commenting on what happens on today's Internet. We aim to convince our readers with interesting tidbits on all topics around networking technology, Internet and sometimes a short insight on what we are planning next.