Following up on the net neutrality workshop organized by VATMearlier this year, in a second meeting last week there seemed to be some consensus among German operators that charging content providers for downstream traffic sent mostly from the United States through their networks to German subscribers, though an intriguing idea, will not work. And these subscribers will remain their main revenue source also in the near future. So what can ISPs do to counter the downward spiral of ever faster and cheaper flat rate plans?
Honestly, I am surprised by the great response to OpenDPI. Two weeks after releasing version 1.0 we have counted 1000 downloads. This is much more than we expected for this very special piece of software.
Making the own intellectual property public is an interesting experience. Of course we had a long internal discussion about that irreversible step beforehand. What do we give away and what will we get back? What will other people say about our software? But all responses showed that it was the right step.
Last week, I participated in a workshop session called “Deep Packet Inspection: Technology, Promise & Controversy. What You Need to Know.” at the Broadband World Forum Europe 2009 in Paris. The panel discussion with participants from DPI vendors, Internet service providers and net neutrality activists was meant to “foster an open, balanced and rigorous discussion of DPI’s capabilities, benefits, limits and concerns”.
Many Internet users worry about net neutrality and online privacy these days. And they see deep packet inspection (DPI) as their arch enemy. Common claims are that DPI reads the content of all packets and then decides based on the nature of the content whether to forward, slow down or drop that packet. This is a misconception based on poor understanding how today’s DPI for Internet traffic management works.
DPI is only the core technology of traffic management systems that is used for application classification. This is done by scanning the first few packets — including their payload — of each network flow for certain patterns out of a predefined list. DPI does not ‘read’ or even ‘understand’ any communication content. As soon as the communicating application of a network flow is identified, DPI stops for that flow. Then, bandwidth management rules determine how this flow is treated. Possible rules are:
Finally!! We have been waiting for these test results for quite some time yet. The actual measurements were conducted back in January. So what happened then? As noted in the Internet Evolution test report published last Thursday, “Vendors got the right to review their results and our interpretations related to their results“. Apparently, some vendors took longer for this process to finish than others. Let’s not speculate about the reasons here.
Deep packet inspection (DPI) is a controversial technology and has become a red flag for privacy protection activists. Particularly the debate between US cable operator Comcast and the government regulator FCC has attracted much media attention and contributed to the discredit of DPI. The FCC says in its Memorandum Opinion and Order against Comcast:
“[…] Comcast opens its customers’ mail because it wants to deliver mail not based on the address or type of stamp on the envelope but on the type of letter contained therein.”
Welcome to the ipoque Corporate Blog. In this space ipoque bloggers and guests are commenting on what happens on today's Internet. We aim to convince our readers with interesting tidbits on all topics around networking technology, Internet and sometimes a short insight on what we are planning next.